Muskoka Lakes Township hears Swift River alternate construction offer

SREL offers $100K to use Township lands other than park owned by Crown

Published April 21, 10pm: Bala United Church wants it. According to a survey, 79% of respondents want it. The president of the Moon River Property Owner’s Association doesn’t want it. But will the Township of Muskoka Lakes bite?

The ‘it’ is an alternative construction plan that would potentially protect public use of Margaret Burgess Park during the construction of the controversial hydro plant at north Bala Falls. It would also generate revenue for the Township.

On Thursday, Swift River Energy Limited (SREL), the developer for the proposed North Bala small hydro project, spelled out alternate construction plans for the project that would leave Margaret Burgess Park, beside the Church, untouched.

Instead of using the park and building a bridge across the falls, the developer proposes to use the Township lands beside the planned hydro building site (directly on the south side of the north Bala Falls), along with the Precambrian Shield parking lot diagonally across from the site.

“I am authorized today to offer $100,000 as a lump sum payment,” SREL Project Manager Karen McGhee told Council, “in return for leasing the Township land and using the parking lot during the expected 14-18 month construction period.”

Bala United Church delegates to council, asks park to be left alone; MRPOA president asks Council to not allow the use of other lands

McGhee’s offer came after a presentation by the Bala United Church in which church trustee Ian Croft said the church membership wanted to ensure the park beside the church would not be used during construction. Moon River Property Owner’s Association President (MRPOA) Sandy Currie stated he did not want to see the Township lands or parking lot (the alternate plan) used. (For more on Croft’s presentation, as well as presentations by Currie and Mitchell Shnier, see Bala United Church asks Council to accept alternative hydro build plan).

Orange is Margaret Burgess Park, Green is Crown Land-Hydro Plant Site. Blue land beside green is Township land and Blue across highway is the Shield Parking Lot. SREL proposes using the blue areas instead of the orange (the Park).
Orange is Margaret Burgess Park, Green is Crown Land-Hydro Plant Site. Blue land beside green is Township land and Blue across highway is the Shield Parking Lot. SREL proposes using the blue areas instead of the orange (the Park).

“Essentially,” explained McGhee to Council, “we would stay out of the ‘orange’ areas and they would remain open for public use during construction.  There would be no need to remove trees in the Park, no bridge over the falls, and no crane in front of the falls and there would be reduced truck traffic through town.”

She added part of the proposal could be to re-grade and rehabilitate the Township lands used after construction. McGhee wrapped up by saying she had a problem with the flow diagrams shown by the presenters who came before her. “Those flows shown are from the spring freshet, and not from the summer season so they are misleading.” Finally she said SREL would like the opportunity to discuss and help consult on local bylaws that “we see unfairly targeting the project, such as half load and blasting [bylaws].

This is not the first time Swift River has tried to spell out alternate construction plans to the Township. SREL Vice President Frank Belerique wanted to talk mitigation plans at a Council meeting on October 18th but the Mayor told him he couldn’t talk about that. A discussion about safety ensued with McGhee answering questions she claims have been answered previously and repeatedly. All Councillors were present at that meeting.

SREL asked to talk mitigation plans with Council but meeting never happened

Ahead of that October 18 meeting, McGhee says Township and all Councillors were sent an email describing the mitigation plans and the desire to discuss a potential lease offer.  Read receipts attached to that email showed at least five Councillors did receive the email on October 15, says McGhee. She says she also met with two Councillors in person to discuss the alternate plans and one other Councillor did respond directly to the email. Yet on March 10, Councillor Phil Harding sent an email to CAO Chris Wray and Clerk Cheryl Mortimer asking. “Have we actually received a formal request that we have denied?”. He

Water crashing behind MNR public notice sign shows plant site on south side of north Bala Falls
Water crashing behind MNR public notice sign shows plant site on south side of north Bala Falls and powerful effect of spring freshet, April 21, 2013

was asking the question in response to a constituent who had requested he consider the alternative construction plans in order to “Save Burgess Park”. Harding had been in the October 18 meeting when SREL’s Belerique raised the desire for a meeting to discuss mitigation plans (as a follow up to SREL’s written request). Minutes from the meeting read:

‘Belerique reviewed the current status of the project and requested an opportunity to meet with municipal staff  to discuss options to reduce impacts to the community during the project construction.”

That request was never granted. Some Councillors have told Muskoka News Watch (MNW) and others that they can not have any discussion regarding the hydro plant because of a pending defamation lawsuit, yet that didn’t stop Council from discussing the project in a public meeting on January 21 — which focused on a design concept survey that included SREL’s mitigation plans.

Mitigation plan offered up in January survey asking for public input; survey likened to ‘blackmail’, says Councillor Nishikawa

Council included a discussion about the SREL Design Concept Survey under New and Unfinished Business in its January 21, 2014 meeting. The survey seeking public input was advertised widely in local newspapers (and also on MNW) in January to gather potential plant design preferences. In it, Swift River showed a map of the Crown lands it has been provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources to use for construction purposes. These lands include the areas in Bala known as Diver’s Point, Margaret Burgess Park, and the proposed hydro plant site. The survey asked people to say whether they would prefer other lands be used as opposed to the park for such activities as trucks driving through the park and equipment being on the site, blocking the popular park for public use during construction. During the January 21 meeting, Councillor Don Furniss said he had completed the survey himself.

Councillor Ruth Nishikawa shared what she thought about the survey. “The conversation that is happening says this [the survey] is blackmail,” said Nishikawa. “This council has not made a decision. People are asking if they are going to take the park away. They already have the lease on it. It’s misinformation again.” Mayor Alice Murphy complained that “there was no place in the survey to say you didn’t want it [the plant]” and that “in order to have option one, they want land from option two to dump all the dirt and mud so we’ll lose access and portage, and this is all to be done to protect the park.” Councillor Harding added he felt the survey was biased, saying “a decision could not be based on this survey, and Council’s responsibility is to listen to the taxpayers’ voices.” Furniss countered the survey wasn’t blackmail; rather, it was a choice.

Once the survey deadline passed and results tabulated, McGhee says the survey showed 79% of respondents would prefer the park NOT be used, and 21% chose the existing construction plan. She shared this information with council on Thursday (it has been public on SREL’s web site since early February). When asked by MNW about any comments provided with the survey, McGhee said that some who said they should go ahead and use the park expressed a lack of confidence that the Township would be willing to collaborate with the company. In fact, one comment stated: “good luck getting permission [from the Township].” Another stated they wanted the vacant Township lands protected, adds McGhee, noting there was opportunity for public input from anyone with any position on the proposed site. (You can view highlights of the Design Concept Survey by clicking here).

Entrance permit request back at District this Wednesday

Next step for Swift River is to meet with the District of Muskoka Public Works committee regarding its Entrance Permit application to access the proposed hydro plant site. The Township is represented on that committee by Councillor Harding. The legal representative for the Township is also on the agenda – an appearance four Councillors and one staff member have said was never discussed at Council, nor was any direction given for lawyer Harold Elston to appear this Wednesday. Elston has been the legal mind hired to continue to block the hydro plant so it is widely believed he will try and quash SREL’s request for a District entrance permit. SREL had been asked by District to give Township the opportunity to comment, which it did in February. According to McGhee, the item has never appeared on a Township Council agenda; and the answer she says she has received from Township Public Works is that it is ‘too premature’ to comment. An entrance permit on to District land off Muskoka Road 169 is up to District only to grant.

“Swift River eager to sit down with Council…share savings with Township”: Excerpt from October 15, 2013 letter to all Councillors

Below is a condensed version of the October 15 letter requesting a meeting with Council to discuss a mitigation proposal with Council before seeking further public input. To read the entire letter in PDF form, please see References after the letter.

Township of Muskoka Lakes, Attn: Mr. Chris Wray, CAO

Re: North Bala Falls Small Hydro Project – Request for Closed Door Meeting with Mayor and Council

Dear Chris:

This letter is in response to your emails outlining the pre-requisites for attaining a closed meeting with the Mayor and Council to discuss the North Bala Small Hydro Project. {Note that there will be no discussion regarding any pending lawsuit(s) or any topics under consideration of those lawsuits}.

As the Township is aware, Swift River is in the process of completing the construction drawings and attaining the required permits for construction. As the Township is also aware, the amount of land available for the construction of the project is somewhat limited. Our design engineers have, however, managed to devise a workable plan using the lands available that is financially viable.

That said, they have also noted that should Swift River be afforded the use of certain parcels of Township lands, the construction could be somewhat simplified.

Swift River has therefore requested to meet with the Council to discuss some options that may be available for construction that could be seen as win-win-win solutions for Swift River, the Township, and the community.

In particular, the lands we are interested in using include (see attached map):

1. The parcel of land immediately adjacent to the Project site that was transferred to the Township from the District in 2011 (PIN 48029-0638);

2. The Shield Parking Lot (PIN 48029-0634); and

3. The Township’s portion of the Portage Landing Parking Lot (PIN 48154-0628) and / or permission to use the MNR portion of this lot that is currently leased by the Township. Land parcels 2 and 3 would only be used for storage of trailers, equipment (including any equipment typically found on a construction site) and construction materials. There would be a requirement to fence the area to be used. Other than fencing, the lands would not be disturbed in any way. Any disturbances, including from fence posts, would be repaired prior to leaving the site at the end of construction. The use of these parcels of land for the Project would effectively reduce the requirements of storage in other areas in and around town such as the Crown land north of the North Dam commonly referred to as Margaret Burgess Park.

There are several options for use of land Parcel 1 that we would like to discuss at the proposed meeting. These would include site access, storage of materials, installation of tower crane, etc.

These activities would require tree removal and earthworks. It is also proposed that the Township consider working with SREL to deposit the rock from the Project excavation on this parcel of land for possible re-grading and landscaping. The use of this parcel of land for the Project would reduce the requirements of storage in other areas in and around town such as at Margaret Burgess Park. If permission was granted to re-grade Parcel 1 with rock from the excavation, it would also eliminate the requirement to install a bridge over the North Channel, install the tower crane downstream of the dam and truck materials through Margaret Burgess Park. Parcel 1 would be restored prior to leaving the site at the end of construction.

Compensation ideas are welcome. Possibilities include:

1. Lump sum lease payment for duration of construction based on number of months on site.

2. Construction work completed in lieu of cash i.e. the contractor could perform a construction task(s) for the Township as payment for the lease. This could include full re-grading and professional landscaping of Parcel 3.

3. A combination of 1 and 2.

4. Alternative proposed by Township.

With respect to the Township’s requirement to address the matters contained in CouncilResolution SC-18-28/07/11: This resolution is out of date. It was written over 2 years ago when Swift River was still pursuing Option 2 and awaiting an MOE decision on the elevation requests. Since that time there has been significant progress in the development of the Project, in particular:

· The MOE Minister denied all appeal requests for the Option 2 plan;

· The facility was moved, redesigned and re-evaluated. Ultimately Swift River issued an addendum to the original Environmental Screening Review Report (ESRR) for the Option 1 plan;

· The MOE Director denied all elevation requests made for the Option 1 plan;

· The MOE Minister denied all appeal requests for the Option 1 plan;

· The federal Canadian Environmental Assessment was cancelled by CEAA;

· The Department of Fisheries and Oceans has confirmed no permit is required;

· Swift River has undertaken further heritage studies on the area;

· The upstream booms have been moved and fencing has been erected around the dams by MNR; and

· Swift River has received Location Approval from MNR.

Swift River therefore respectfully submits that it has already fulfilled the requirements of the resolution in so far as they apply to the newly designed project with the exception of a few outstanding approvals, and a decision will need to be made on the leasing of these lands prior to us applying for these final approvals.

Swift River Energy is eager to sit down with the Township and discuss how to make theconstruction of this facility as smooth as possible. It is our firm belief that the use of these lands will significantly reduce the impacts to the community. In addition, it would make our work easier. Therefore, we are open to sharing some of the savings that could be realized with the Township.

It has been a long 8 years and we are nearing the end of this Project. Now is the time to start working together on the finer details to ensure we “get it right” for everyone involved.

We await your written confirmation of a closed door meeting with the Mayor and Council on October 18th. Please let us know before noon on the 17th so we can make the appropriate arrangements.

Karen McGhee, North Bala Small Hydro Project Manager

cc: Township of Muskoka Lakes Mayor and Council

References and Related Articles:

MNW April 21, Bala United Church asks Township to accept alternative hydro plant build

October 15, 2013 Letter requesting meeting from SREL to Township: 2013-10-15 Request for closed meeting with TML

April 8, 2013 Letter from SREL to Township re ongoing issues: SREL_Letter_to_Township_re_ongoing_issues

Bracebridge Examiner, January 22, 2014: Swift River Survey Irks Muskoka Lakes Mayor

Moose FM, January 13, 2014: Swift River launches stage one of design survey

Moose FM, April 9, 2014: Court of Appeal will hear Township portage argument

MNW, April 9, 2014: Legal leap forward: Township wins right to appeal

MNW, August 20, 2013: Exclusive: Superior Court says public safety trumps other parts of Public Lands Act

About Muskoka News Watch – consider donating to keep information flowing: Muskoka News Watch exists primarily on donations. If you appreciate us keeping you informed, consider tossing a few dollars our way via the Donate Button on the top right hand corner of our Home Page. Thank you!

NHL alumnus visits Muskoka as part of Lake of Bays Brewery and NHL alumni contest

Mike Krushelnyski in Bracebridge March 5 to kick off Lace Up with NHL Alumni

Posted Feb. 28, 3.45pm: Now that Lakes of Bays Brewing has the NHL Alumni ‘on speed dial’ as the Baysville company is the Alumni’s official brewery partner, the company has announced it has got none other than NHL alumnus Mike Krushelnyski to drop in to Muskoka next week for a personal appearance. The company issued a press release about its Lace Up with the NHL Alumni campaign kick off today. The details from that release are below. 

Lake of Bays Brewery Press Release:
Mike Krushelnyski (the friendliest NHL alumnus and best Battle of the Blades sport ever), is coming to town to kick off Lace Up with the NHL Alumni, a contest organized by Lake of Bays Brewing and the NHL Alumni Association, in which 18 lucky winners will get to play in an NHL Alumni game and after party, taking place in Sudbury on Saturday May 10.

Mike Krushelnyski in Muskoka, Muskoka News Watch, NHL in Bracebridge, Lake of Bays BreweryWho: Mike Krushelnyski
What: Personal appearance and autograph session
Where: Old Station Restaurant in Bracebridge
When: Wednesday March 5, starting at 6:30 pm
Why: To kick off Lace Up with NHL Alumni contest in Bracebridge

Come on down and meet Mike and share a Top Shelf Classic Lager with us. The life of any party going, Mike likes to bring his Stanley Cup Championship rings along and foist them onto anyone willing to try them on for size.

In addition to being a heck of a personable guy, Mike has had a formidable professional hockey career. He spent 14 years with the NHL, playing for Toronto, Edmonton, Detroit, Boston, and Los Angeles.

Mike Krushelnyski in Muskoka, Muskoka News Watch, NHL in Bracebridge, Lake of Bays Brewery
Lace Up with NHL Alumnus Mike Krushelnyski

He is a three-time Stanley Cup champ on ice (Edmonton ’85, ’87 and ’88) and one time as assistant coach (Detroit ’98). More recently, he competed in the 4th season of Battle of the Blades, skating alongside Marcy Hinzmann.

About Lace Up with the NHL Alumni

The prize: 18 lucky hockey fans get to don their skates and play in a game of shinny alongside the likes of Mark Napier, Mike Pelyk, Bill Derlago, and Jack Valiquette. (Additional NHLAA to be announced). The game is set for Saturday May 10 in Sudbury, and the after party will be at Overtime Sports Bar and Grill, also in Sudbury.

Three Ways to Enter

1. At participating licensees
From March 4 to April 22, patrons at The Old Station Restaurant in Bracebridge, Lockeroom Barrie, Boston Pizza North Bay and Overtime Sports Bar and Grill in Sudbury can fill out a ballot to enter.

The ballots also double as scratch and win tickets, awarding NHL Alumni memorabilia and discounts for Signature Series Club membership. (Signature Series Club is an online beer and collectables club launched in December by Lake of Bays Brewing and the NHLAA. Go to to learn more.)

If you’re planning to be in the North Bay area next Saturday, March 8, Walter Gretzky (aka The Great One’s dad) will be at Boston Pizza to kick the contest off, starting at 11:30 am.

The licensee draw will take place in late April.

2. At participating LCBOs
Look for ballots at nearly 70 participating LCBOs across Central and Northern Ontario. NHL Alumni will be dropping by for an awareness-raising autograph session at the following times and places:

  • March 6: Matthew Barnaby in Sault Ste Marie
  • March 8: Marty McSorley and Matthew Barnaby in North Bay
  • March 15: Timmins, Sudbury, Barrie. NHL Alumni to be announced.

The LCBO draw will take place on the week of March 20. Email us if you would like specific times and locations for those appearances.

3. On Facebook
One lucky Lake of Bays Brewing Facebook friend will get to take part. Just go to our Facebook page, like us and click the contest link. The winner of that one will receive an overnight for two in Sudbury as well.


Bracebridge shows it has heart for Heart Month; learn how you can prevent heart disease

Bracebridge raises flag for Heart Month awareness; experts say heart attacks fully preventable

Posted Feb. 4, 1:15 pm: The Town of Bracebridge is recognizing February as Heart Month by flying the Heart and Stroke Foundation Flag at the Bracebridge Municipal Office.

Foundation Program Coordinator Vernice Smith and volunteer Rhona Windsor joined Bracebridge Mayor Graydon Smith yesterday in raising the flag in a bid to increase awareness of heart disease and stroke.

Heart month, news about Muskoka, Bracebridge, Graydon Smith, Heart and Stroke Foundation, February news about Muskoka
Heart and Stroke Foundation Program Coordinator Vernice Smith and volunteer Rhona Windsor join Bracebridge Mayor Graydon Smith in raising the Heart and Stroke Foundation Flag at the Town of Bracebridge Municipal Office to signal the start of Heart Month. (Submitted photo taken Feb. 3)

Heart Month is the Foundation’s major opportunity to connect with millions of Canadians and to inform them about the risks of heart disease and stroke. The volunteers are the face and voice of the Heart and Stroke Foundation, and they give it their all during the Person-to-Person campaign to raise funds for research and share the health knowledge.

“The Town of Bracebridge is pleased to support the incredible work of the Heart and Stroke volunteers in the community,” said Mayor Graydon Smith. “As heart disease and stroke have touched many of our lives, the Person-to-Person Campaign is a very effective way to ensure people understand the risks of heart disease and stroke,” said Smith.

Over $1million raised in our region

In Simcoe County/Muskoka, the Heart and Stroke Foundation raised over 1 million dollars in 2013 through Door to Door Campaigns, Jump Rope for Heart, Big Bike and the Chase McEachern Tribute fund thanks to volunteers. The funds that are raised go toward lifesaving research of heart disease and stroke.

According to the Heart and Stroke Foundation:

  • Heart disease and stroke take one life every 7 minutes.
  • More than 1.6 Canadians are living with the effects of heart disease and stroke, and 9 out of 10 Canadians have at least one risk factor.

While the cardiovascular death rate in Canada has gone down by nearly 40 per cent in the last decade – largely due to research advances in surgical procedures, drug therapies and prevention efforts (as well as awareness campaigns like that run by the Foundation), several esteemed experts say no one ever needs to have a heart attack.

Heart attacks are predictable and preventable

“Nobody should ever now die of a heart attack – we can prevent them,” says Dr. Elaine Chin, a leading expert in preventative health and Chief Medical Officer for Executive Health Centre (she is also a member of the Muskoka News Watch editorial board). “Today we can identify and predict those who are at risk for a heart attack before it happens – and stop it from ever happening: early screening can save your life.” Read more about preventing heart attacks in an article by Dr. Elaine Chin. In it, she recommends Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s “The Last Heart Attack” as a must-watch video.

Heart disease is tragic personally and also devastating to our economy. According to the Conference Board of Canada, heart disease and stroke costs the Canadian economy more than $20.9 billion every year in physician services, hospital costs, lost wages and decreased productivity.

Welcome February and more snow: we could get another 10cm Saturday night in Muskoka

Snow Watch February 1, 6pm: We could have another 10 centimetres before the snowfall lets up at midnight tonight and then we could still see some more flurries heading into Groundhog Day. We should see skies clearing by late afternoon Sunday and the good news: it’s warmer than we’ve experienced the past few weeks – Sunday’s high is near minus 6.

Blowing snow still causing problems in our region – Hwy 11 SB was closed at Stephenson Rd due to an accident there – now open at 5.17pm; Environment Canada suggests avoiding areas of snow squalls

Posted Jan. 29: 4:45pm: Snow squalls continue to cause dangerous winter driving conditions due to sudden zero visibility in whiteouts. The Ministry of Transportation reports one accident on Hwy 11 Southbound at Stephenson Road today that had one lane closed for an hour or so this afternoon until just after 5pm. Still be careful on SB 11 between Bracebridge and Utterson.

Environment Canada has updated its snow squall warning and it looks like we won’t get a break from those squalls until later this evening. It reports:

“Multiple snow squalls will continue in a stiff and cold west flow off Lake Huron, Georgian Bay and Lake Erie. Snow squalls are affecting primarily the Bruce Peninsula and areas east of Georgian Bay south to Midland.”

Snow is expected to pile up rapidly within the snow bands, and local snowfall rates of about 10 centimetres per 12 hours are possible, according to Environment Canada. The agency suggests drivers should consider adjusting travel plans including avoiding regions of snow squalls all together.

New Windchill Warning posted Monday, January 27

Extremely cold wind chills developing today and tonight. In the wake of a cold front, falling temperatures and strong winds will generate wind chill values into the minus 30s tonight and likely into Tuesday in most areas. Tomorrow the high is expected to be minus 15 with the windchill making it feel like minus 34. We could warm up heading toward the weekend – Saturday’s forecast from Environment Canada suggests the thermometer may make it up to a high of minus 4.

Southern Ontario cold front expected to move Muskoka way overnight. windchill could bring windchill of minus 35 on Tuesday

Posted Jan. 19, 8:35pm: That sharp cold front sweeping across Southern Ontario could make itself felt in Muskoka overnight and bring extremely colder conditions on Tuesday. As if Monday wasn’t cold enough with temperatures of minus 16 feeling like minus 26 with

weather, snow, muskoka news, news about muskoka, wild turkeys, milford bay
Wild turkeys take shelter from the snow squalls today at home near Milford Bay

the windchill.  Environment Canada says deepening cold air, combined with moderate winds, could result in even colder wind chill values ranging from minus 20 to as cold as minus 35 on Tuesday morning.

Historical average temperatures for this time in January are usually closer to minus 17. If weather forecasts are correct, the earliest we may see temperatures rise close to zero again will be January 28 (or possibly not until early February).

Along the front, bands of intense flurries developed today bringing periods of near zero visibilities in snow and blowing snow, along with a quick few centimetres of accumulation. The good news is that a snow squall warning for the Muskoka region ended tonight (Sunday) by 7:30pm.

Please stay warm and safe monitor the latest forecasts and warnings for the Muskoka region from Environment Canada. or click on the Weather Network button on the Muskoka News Watch home page.